Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus vs Vivo X200 Ultra
58
out 100
VS
94
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Manufactured in August, 2019, with display 6.8 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825, vs Vivo X200 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
- Lighter design: 196g vs 229g
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3040 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 495 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.1 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 95.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 250 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3.6 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 163.14 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) | 76.76 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.69 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Red |
- Black - Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max Frequency | 2730 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A75) - 2/2.73 (M4) |
- 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU Cores | 432 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 770 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 651.5 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 963 | 2979 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2544 | 9353 |
| CPU | 169143 | 601093 |
| GPU | 208710 | 1227523 |
| Memory | 148420 | 415530 |
| UX | 141661 | 474013 |
| NanoReview Score | 667934 | 2718159 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3377 | n/a |
| Writing score | 10979 | n/a |
| Web score | 7212 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5811 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6704 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9038 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 31.6 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 4.0 | OriginOS 5 |
Battery
| Volume | 4300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes Qi/PMA (15 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (65% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:05 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 06:30 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:51 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:44 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 105 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 - 2.4 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung SAK2L4 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 52 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M3 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3P9 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 122 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.65 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B20/B150/B2048) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | August, 2019 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2019 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1099 | 900 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 25 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
