Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus
80
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2400e, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus, Manufactured in November, 2021 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 920. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher battery capacity: 4700mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 204g vs 213g
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88 % | 86.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162 mm (6.38 in) | 163.65 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) | 76.19 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.34 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 204 g (7.2 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue - Green - Yellow |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400e | MediaTek Dimensity 920 |
| Max Frequency | 3110 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.96 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.59 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.9 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.11 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1095 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3406.8 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2147 | 928 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6825 | 2325 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 15442 | n/a |
| CPU | 434890 | 174554 |
| GPU | 726970 | 109191 |
| Memory | 318963 | 108745 |
| UX | 296630 | 157328 |
| NanoReview Score | 1777453 | 549818 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 12 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 2125 |
| Writing score | n/a | 12160 |
| Web score | n/a | 8057 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6762 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9426 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10669 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 23.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (56% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 7 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:10 h | 0:16 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:20 h | 06:07 h |
| Video Playback | 13:33 h | 10:32 h |
| Games | 05:11 h | 04:37 h |
| Standby Mode | 129 h | 84 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 | Samsung S5KHM2 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57 | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 75 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08A10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | Samsung S5K4H7 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 60 | n/a |
| Preview | 69 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | Sony IMX 471 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.65 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | November, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 350 |
| MSRP ($) | 649 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 120 W |
Note
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE:
The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S24 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
