Tecno Camon 30 vs Xiaomi Poco C40
56
out 100
VS
40
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 30 Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate, vs Xiaomi Poco C40, Manufactured in July, 2022 with chipsetJLQ JR510. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 30
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 197.5g vs 204g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C40
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.71 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1650 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 400 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 83.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 93.1 % |
| Response time | n/a | 34 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1170:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.3 mm (6.51 in) | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 9.18 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 197.5 g (6.97 oz) | 204 g (7.2 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IP52 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Orange |
- Black - Green - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate | JLQ JR510 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
n/a |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | Yes | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 730 | 217 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1976 | 797 |
| CPU | 127249 | 52804 |
| GPU | 71853 | 16776 |
| Memory | 104907 | 54670 |
| UX | 110435 | 36529 |
| NanoReview Score | 414444 | 160779 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| OS Size | n/a | 12 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | MIUI 13 for POCO |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:44 h | 4:00 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:04 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:58 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:25 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 141 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 50 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2, 3, 5, 8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | July, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | July, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 205 | 149 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 30 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
