Tecno Spark Go 2 vs Oppo Find X9
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2 Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc T7250, vs Oppo Find X9, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Lighter design: 186g vs 203g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1256x2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 90.4 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 157 mm (6.18 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) |
| Thickness | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray |
- White - Black - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 438 | 3291 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1437 | 9664 |
| CPU | 95156 | 1017782 |
| GPU | 26471 | 1439021 |
| Memory | 109093 | 681095 |
| UX | 70926 | 763877 |
| NanoReview Score | 301646 | 3901775 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.65 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-808 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 73 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.74 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | June, 2025 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2025 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 80 | 999 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0