Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
43
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2024 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, Manufactured in June, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2024
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 219g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4700mAh
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 87.2 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 177 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 9 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.69 mm (6.44 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.55 mm (0.34 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP53 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Green |
- White - Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 386 | 1258 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1386 | 3470 |
| CPU | 82356 | 242385 |
| GPU | 22960 | 249241 |
| Memory | 83576 | 139319 |
| UX | 58448 | 181202 |
| NanoReview Score | 247340 | 812147 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 45.7 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 22 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3818 |
| Writing score | n/a | 13789 |
| Web score | n/a | 6769 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5975 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7863 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10406 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes Quick Charge 4+ (100% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:10 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:43 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 15:53 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:40 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 120 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Macro: 5 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.89 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX686 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.7 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 13 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 13 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 5963x3354 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM: B2/B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA: 1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) |
| LTE category | 7 | 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | May, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | 500 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
