Vivo iQOO 13 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
91
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO 13 Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, Manufactured in January, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO 13
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 187g vs 213g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 89.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 96.6 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 713 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) | 161.15 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 74.24 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.13 mm (0.32 in) | 7.98 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP54 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Silver - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3070 | 1028 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9645 | 2971 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 25231 | n/a |
| CPU | 635739 | 190388 |
| GPU | 1237734 | 117929 |
| Memory | 460296 | 156593 |
| UX | 457187 | 143792 |
| NanoReview Score | 2790956 | 609002 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 46.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 18 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3018 |
| Writing score | 27664 | 14428 |
| Web score | 14436 | 11839 |
| Video editing | 6785 | 7161 |
| Data manipulation | 13966 | 10172 |
| NanoReview Score | 17969 | 12602 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | n/a | 56 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6150 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (91% in 30 min) | Yes (49% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:32 h | 0:42 h |
| Web Browsing | 14:22 h | 08:32 h |
| Video Playback | 17:57 h | 11:56 h |
| Games | 08:12 h | 04:57 h |
| Standby Mode | 129 h | 95 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 16384x12288 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital (lossless), 4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | n/a |
| Focal length | 46 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX816 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC32E1 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 650 | 305 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes 67 W |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G:
There are two models of the phone (depending on the market): one with a dual physical SIM tray and the other with one physical SIM slot + an eSIM.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO 13 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
