Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro
90
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo Manufactured in January, 2026, with display 6.59 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro, Manufactured in June, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Super. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
- Higher pixel density: 466ppi
- Lighter design: 202g vs 213g
Reasons to choose OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7600mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2750 pixels | 1272x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.6:9 |
| Pixel density | 466 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9 % | 89.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 157.6 mm (6.2 in) | 162.6 mm (6.4 in) |
| Width | 74.4 mm (2.93 in) | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Pink |
- Gray - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Super |
| Max Frequency | 3800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | 6/3.32 () | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 829 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1200 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2457.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2753 | 1055 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9572 | 3177 |
| CPU | 1057948 | 445015 |
| GPU | 1157399 | 193175 |
| Memory | 572070 | 215728 |
| UX | 811621 | 291595 |
| NanoReview Score | 3599038 | 1098457 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 6 | OxygenOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 7600 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 (0.64) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 16 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 (0.25) | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2026 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2026 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 350 | 295 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
