Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Samsung Galaxy A50
91
out 100
VS
40
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Samsung Galaxy A50, Manufactured in March, 2019 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A50
- Larger display: 6.4in
- Lighter design: 166g vs 187g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 650 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 84.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 141.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 361 Hz | 119 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 7 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) | 158.5 mm (6.24 in) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green - Pink |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 54 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 91.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2696 | 506 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8536 | 1550 |
| CPU | 550000 | 83882 |
| GPU | 1124744 | 42251 |
| Memory | 382394 | 58058 |
| UX | 395421 | 75732 |
| NanoReview Score | 2452559 | 259923 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 44.5 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 746 |
| Writing score | n/a | 6360 |
| Web score | n/a | 4826 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5198 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5373 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6024 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 55 GB | 22 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | One UI 3.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (62% in 30 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 35 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 1:50 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:58 h | 07:00 h |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | 11:18 h |
| Games | 05:59 h | 04:38 h |
| Standby Mode | 131 h | 86 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 25 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 5288x3968 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 25 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 25 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX576 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/2.78 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.9 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 25 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 6024x4024 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.9 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | February, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 650 | 395 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
