Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Ultra and Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

94 out 100
Vivo X200 Ultra
VS
81 out 100
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.82in
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Lighter design: 229g vs 233.5g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5700mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB    		 - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo X200 Ultra and Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Vivo X200 Ultra
    vs
    Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED OLED
    Size 6.82 in 6.8 in
    Resolution 1440x3168 pixels 1276x2848 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
    Pixel density 510 ppi 459 ppi
    Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
    HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10
    Touch Sampling Rate n/a 300 Hz
    Screen-to-body ratio 89.7 % 90 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming    		 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 163.14 mm (6.42 in) 163 mm (6.42 in)
    Width 76.76 mm (3.02 in) 76.1 mm (3 in)
    Thickness 8.69 mm (0.34 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
    Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 233.5 g (8.24 oz)
    Water resistance IP69 IP69
    Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
    Back panel Glass Glass
    Frame Metal Metal
    Colors - Black
    - Silver
    - Red    		 - Black
    - Gold
    - Brown
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo X200 Ultra
    89.7 %
    Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
    90 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo X200 Ultra and Huawei Pura 80 Ultra In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite HiSilicon Kirin 9020
    Max Frequency 4320 MHz 2500 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
    Architecture - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
    - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))    		 - 4/1.6 (Taishan-Little)
    - 3/2.15 (TaiShan V120)
    - 1/2.5 (TaiShan V121)
    Process TSMC SMIC
    Transistor Size 3 nm 7 nm
    Neural Processor Hexagon Da Vinci
    Graphics Adreno 830 Maleoon 920
    GPU Cores 1536 1024
    GPU Frequency 1100 MHz 840 MHz
    FLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS 1720.3 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo X200 Ultra
    2979
    Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
    1610
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo X200 Ultra
    9353
    Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
    5144
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)29791610
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)93535144
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Ultra]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo X200 Ultra
    2718159
    Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
    1175329
    CPU601093355787
    GPU1227523282352
    Memory415530318260
    UX474013218930
    NanoReview Score27181591175329

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 12 GB
    - 16 GB    		 16 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
    Memory Frequency 5333 MHz n/a
    Channels 2 4
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB
    - 1024 GB    		512 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
    Memory CardNoNo

    Software

    OS Android 15 HarmonyOS (Upgradeable to HarmonyOS 5.1)
    UI Skin OriginOS 5 n/a

    Battery

    Volume 6000 mAh 5700 mAh
    Max Charging Power 90 W 100 W
    Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging Yes (40 W) Yes (80 W)
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes (Wireless)
    Fast Charging Yes Yes

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
    Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 9.4x
    Flash Dual LED LED
    Stabilization Optical Optical
    8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 960 fps (1080p)
    Wide-angle lens 116 ° n/a
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 200 MP
    Ultra-wide: 50 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 12.5 MP
    Ultra-wide: 40 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    - RAW support    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.7f/1.6 - 4.0
    Focal length35 mm23 mm
    SensorSony LYT-818n/a
    Sensor size1/1.281/0
    Pixel size1.22 μm1.6 μm
    AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalOptical
    Telephoto
    Matrix200 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/2.2f/2.4
    Focal length85 mm83 mm
    SensorSamsung ISOCELL HP9n/a
    Sensor size1/1.4n/a
    Pixel size0.56 μmn/a
    StabilizationOpticalOptical
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix50 MP40 MP
    Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
    Focal length14 mm13 mm
    SensorSony LYT-818n/a
    Sensor size1/1.28n/a
    Pixel size122 μm1 μm
    StabilizationDigitalDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 50 MP 13 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 4160x3120 pixels
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.0
    Focal length 24 mm n/a
    Sensor n/a CMOS
    Autofocus n/a Phase autofocus
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 3.2 3.1
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort Yes Yes DP 1.2
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - NAVIC
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzn/a
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)n/a
    5G SupportYesYes

    Sound

    3.5 mm Jack No No
    FM Radio No No
    Dolby Atmos Yes No

    Other

    Class Flagship Flagship
    Announced April, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
    Release Date April, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 900 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 1499
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Barometer
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 80 W Yes 100 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    5 (71.43%)
    2 (28.57%)
    Total Votes: 7

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below