Vivo X200 vs Huawei P40 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Huawei P40 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2020 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 990 5G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 197g vs 209g
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Huawei P40 Pro
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.58 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1200x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 441 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 92.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 365 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 3 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.3 mm (6.31 in) | 158.2 mm (6.23 in) |
| Width | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) | 72.6 mm (2.86 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2860 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.36 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.86 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 576 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 600 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 691.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2693 | 1111 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8706 | 3131 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 23954 | n/a |
| CPU | 561708 | 217681 |
| GPU | 1183490 | 212255 |
| Memory | 399308 | 146459 |
| UX | 409480 | 141962 |
| NanoReview Score | 2553986 | 718357 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 34.2 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 55 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 19 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3286 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | Nano Memory |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10.0 |
| OS Size | n/a | 16.5 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | EMUI 11 |
Battery
| Volume | 5800 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 40 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (27 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | 1:15 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:06 h | 08:10 h |
| Video Playback | 15:50 h | 13:26 h |
| Games | 07:21 h | 04:54 h |
| Standby Mode | 88 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 7680 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 40 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX700 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/3.4 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 125 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JD1 | Sony IMX650 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | 1/1.54 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 75 |
| Preview | n/a | 45 |
| Zoom | n/a | 124 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 6464x4864 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | BSI CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B9/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32) |
| LTE category | n/a | 21 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 580 | 720 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0