Home Phone comparison Vivo X300 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind - Which is better?

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

94 out 100
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
83 out 100
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
Vivo X300 Ultra
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X300 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 232g vs 239g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 6000mAh
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X300 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X300 Ultra
vs
Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 in 6.9 in
Resolution 1440x3168 pixels 1320x2848 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 510 ppi 455 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1800 nits n/a
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 89.9 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.98 mm (6.42 in) 164.4 mm (6.47 in)
Width 76.81 mm (3.02 in) 79 mm (3.11 in)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 in) 8.25 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 232 g (8.18 oz) 239 g (8.43 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Active fan
Back panel Glass Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Green		 - Black
- Gold
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300 Ultra
90.3 %
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
89.9 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X300 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
Max Frequency 4600 MHz 2750 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 9 (1 + 4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance)
- 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)		 - 4/1.72 (Taishan v124 Little)
- 4/2.27 (Taishan v124 Mid)
- 1/2.75 (Taishan v124 Big)
Process TSMC SMIC
Transistor Size 3 nm 5 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon Da Vinci
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 Ultra
3621
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
1830
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 Ultra
10653
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
5772
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)36211830
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)106535772
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X300 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X300 Ultra
4247433
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind
2116240
CPU1192014692245
GPU1543938348639
Memory525105583145
UX986376492211
NanoReview Score42474332116240

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB512 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1n/a
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 HarmonyOS 6
UI Skin OriginOS 6 n/a

Battery

Volume 6600 mAh 6000 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 100 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (40 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 18 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:50 h

Main camera

Matrix 200 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 116 ° 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 40 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix200 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.4 - 4.0
Focal length35 mm24 mm
SensorSony LYT-901n/a
Sensor size1/1.12 (0.89)n/a
Pixel size0.7 μm1.6 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix200 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.7f/2.1
Focal length85 mm91 mm
SensorSamsung ISOCELL HPBn/a
Sensor size1/1.4 (0.71)n/a
Pixel size0.56 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP40 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length14 mm13 mm
SensorSony LYT-818n/a
Sensor size1/1.28 (0.78)n/a
Pixel size1.22 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 4160x3120 pixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.2
Focal length 24 mm 18 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN1 n/a
Sensor size 1/2.76 (0.36) n/a
Pixel size 0.64 μm n/a
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced March, 2026 yr March, 2026 yr
Release Date April, 2026 yr March, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) 1199 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Face Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 80 W Yes, 100 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below