Vivo X90 Pro Plus vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X90 Pro Plus Manufactured in December, 2022, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Tecno Camon 50 4G, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro Plus
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 4G
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 172g vs 221g
- Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 4700mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 222 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm (0.38 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 221 g (7.8 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Red |
- Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1773 | 746 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5153 | 2020 |
| CPU | 385400 | 131686 |
| GPU | 600606 | 72057 |
| Memory | 329145 | 110256 |
| UX | 287653 | 119058 |
| NanoReview Score | 1602804 | 433057 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 35 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 83 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 79 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 13231 | n/a |
| Writing score | 18885 | n/a |
| Web score | 8920 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5984 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9430 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12539 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 37 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | OriginOS | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 12 min) | Yes (44% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:34 h | 1:18 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 503 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 114 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 503 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 90 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX598 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 71 | n/a |
| Zoom | 150 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2022 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2022 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X90 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0