Vivo X90 Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro
78
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X90 Pro Plus Manufactured in December, 2022, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro, Manufactured in March, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro
- Lighter design: 202g vs 221g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4700mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 85.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 222 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) | 164.19 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm (0.38 in) | 8.12 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 221 g (7.8 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Red |
- White - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1773 | 888 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5153 | 2175 |
| CPU | 385400 | 139627 |
| GPU | 600606 | 83565 |
| Memory | 329145 | 96162 |
| UX | 287653 | 118558 |
| NanoReview Score | 1602804 | 437912 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 35 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 83 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 79 fps | 7 fps |
| Graphics Score | 13231 | 1203 |
| Writing score | 18885 | 13967 |
| Web score | 8920 | 9368 |
| Video editing | 5984 | 4974 |
| Data manipulation | 9430 | 8380 |
| NanoReview Score | 12539 | 10508 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| OS Size | 37 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | OriginOS | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 12 min) | Yes (50% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:34 h | 0:47 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 503 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 114 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 503 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Samsung S5KHM2 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 90 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX598 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 71 | n/a |
| Zoom | 150 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM B2/ B3/ B5/ B8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/ B2/ B5/ B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2022 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2022 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X90 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
