Vivo X90 Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
78
out 100
VS
43
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X90 Pro Plus Manufactured in December, 2022, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, Manufactured in June, 2020 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
- Lighter design: 199g vs 221g
- Higher battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4700mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 83.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | 97.7 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 222 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | 32.2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 4608:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm (0.38 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 221 g (7.8 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Red |
- White - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1773 | 516 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5153 | 1562 |
| CPU | 385400 | 89155 |
| GPU | 600606 | 49694 |
| Memory | 329145 | 60565 |
| UX | 287653 | 72643 |
| NanoReview Score | 1602804 | 272057 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 35 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 83 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 79 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 13231 | n/a |
| Writing score | 18885 | n/a |
| Web score | 8920 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5984 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9430 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12539 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 37 GB | 16.5 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 12 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:34 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:31 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:21 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:45 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 121 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 503 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 114 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 503 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 90 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX598 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 71 | n/a |
| Zoom | 150 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 29 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 20 | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2022 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2022 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | 199 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X90 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
