Vivo Y29 vs Oppo A54
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y29 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.68 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300, vs Oppo A54, Manufactured in April, 2021 with chipsetMediatek Helio P35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Y29
- Larger display: 6.68in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Oppo A54
- Higher pixel density: 269ppi
- Lighter design: 192g vs 198g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.68 in | 6.51 in |
| Resolution | 720x1608 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4 % | 82.7 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.75 mm (6.53 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IPX4 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio P35 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1072 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 594 | 479 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1686 | 1522 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1415 | n/a |
| CPU | 128991 | 53877 |
| GPU | 69702 | 18570 |
| Memory | 94190 | 37818 |
| UX | 122775 | 37294 |
| NanoReview Score | 415658 | 147559 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 14 | ColorOS 11.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 44 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (30% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:25 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 90 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4624x3468 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | UMTS 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28B/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | April, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | 160 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 44 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Y29 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
