Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 15 Ultra Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.73 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Huawei Mate 20 Pro, Manufactured in November, 2018with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 980. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.73in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5410mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 20 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 538ppi
- Lighter design: 189g vs 226g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.73 in | 6.39 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1440x3120 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 522 ppi | 538 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 660 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 87.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.7 % | 99.1 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 245 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 4 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.3 mm (6.35 in) | 157.8 mm (6.21 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 72.3 mm (2.85 in) |
| Thickness | 9.35 mm (0.37 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Silver - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | HiSilicon Kirin 980 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.92 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.6 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 360 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 720 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 518.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3008 | 933 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9065 | 2383 |
| CPU | 558586 | 192149 |
| GPU | 1040161 | 158975 |
| Memory | 520300 | 112523 |
| UX | 425326 | 126437 |
| NanoReview Score | 2544373 | 590084 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 46.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 48 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 14 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 2480 |
| Writing score | n/a | 10968 |
| Web score | n/a | 6821 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5781 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7579 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8592 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | Nano Memory |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9 (Upgradeable to Android 10) |
| OS Size | 23.9 GB | 15.2 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | EMUI 10.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5410 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 40 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes Qi (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (72% in 30 min) | Yes SuperCharge (70% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:51 h | 1:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:19 h | 07:46 h |
| Video Playback | 18:43 h | 11:44 h |
| Games | 06:45 h | 04:55 h |
| Standby Mode | 141 h | 98 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 7360x4912 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 115 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 40 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 20 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.63 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Sony IMX600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | 1/1.73 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.7 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 80 | n/a |
| Preview | 89 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 24 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 5632x4224 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 21 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | October, 2018 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | November, 2018 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 1050 |
| MSRP ($) | 1099 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
Note
Xiaomi 15 Ultra:
The Chinese version of the Xiaomi 15 Ultra has a 6000 mAh battery, while the international model comes with 5410 mAh, leading to a noticeable difference in battery life.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 15 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0