Home Phone comparison Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Infinix Note 60 Ultra - Which is better?

Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Infinix Note 60 Ultra

95 out 100
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
VS
84 out 100
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Infinix Note 60 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 17 Ultra Manufactured in December, 2025, with display 6.9 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, vs Infinix Note 60 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 60 Ultra
  • Higher pixel density: 429ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 220g vs 224g
  • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6800mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
vs
Infinix Note 60 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1200x2608 pixels 1208x2644 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 416 ppi 429 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness 1200 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4 % 90.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.9 mm (6.41 in) 162.37 mm (6.39 in)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 in) 77.17 mm (3.04 in)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 in) 7.9 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 220 g (7.76 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP64
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Eco Leather Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Green
- Purple		 - Black
- Silver
- Blue
- Red
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
92.4 %
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
90.1 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Infinix Note 60 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
Max Frequency 4610 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture 6/3.63 () - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon MediaTek NPU 880
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU Cores 1536 896
GPU Frequency 1200 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS 3686.4 GFLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
3510
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
1624
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
10993
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
6706
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)35101624
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)109936706
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a12192
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Infinix Note 60 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
3963774
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
1989585
CPU1198653614651
GPU1458267651828
Memory501472301044
UX805382422062
NanoReview Score39637741989585

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 5300 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity512 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 16
UI Skin HyperOS 3 XOS 16

Battery

Volume 6800 mAh 7000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 100 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse Charging Yes, (Wireless) Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 18 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:48 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 4.3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 1920 fps (720p) 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 115 ° 112 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Focal length23 mm23 mm
Sensor size1/1 (1)1/1.4 (0.71)
Pixel size1.6 μm0.56 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix200 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.4 - 3.0f/2.9
Focal length100 mm80 mm
Sensor size1/1.4 (0.71)1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size0.56 μm0.64 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Focal length14 mm15 mm
SensorOmniVision OV50M40GalaxyCore GC08A8
Sensor size1/2.88 (0.35)1/4 (0.25)
Pixel size0.61 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size 1/2.88 (0.35) n/a
Pixel size 0.61 μm n/a
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM B2 / B3 / B5 / B8n/a
3G BandsWCDMA B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66/B71)n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced December, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
Release Date December, 2025 yr April, 2026 yr
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 17 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below