Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite Manufactured in September, 2019, with display 6.39 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 710, vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra, Manufactured in May, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
- Lighter design: 179g vs 235g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 4030mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.39 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 430 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8 % | 90 % |
| Features | - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 95.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.8 mm (6.17 in) | 163.16 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) | 76.97 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 8.65 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 235 g (8.29 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.7 (Kryo 360 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 360 Gold (Cortex-A75)) |
- 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 685 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 616 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 256 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 527 | 3646 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1574 | 11276 |
| CPU | 97913 | 1166693 |
| GPU | 56171 | 1523262 |
| Memory | 67596 | 509363 |
| UX | 83495 | 886789 |
| NanoReview Score | 305175 | 4086107 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 43.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 96 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 550 | n/a |
| Writing score | 7643 | n/a |
| Web score | 5770 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5646 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5892 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7148 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4030 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 35 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | 0:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:34 h | 16:45 h |
| Video Playback | 11:52 h | 26:15 h |
| Games | 04:35 h | 08:23 h |
| Standby Mode | 138 h | 144 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 10x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 | Sony LYTIA-901 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.12 (0.89) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | OmniVision OV52A |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.28 (0.78) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 14 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYTIA-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.75 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B2100)) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2019 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2019 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 320 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0