Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Honor 400 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C40 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.71 with chipsetJLQ JR510, vs Honor 400 Lite, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C40
- Larger display: 6.71in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5230mAh
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 161g vs 204g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 34 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1170:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) | 161 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 9.18 mm (0.36 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Yellow |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | JLQ JR510 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | n/a | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 217 | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 797 | 2303 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 143 |
| CPU | 52804 | 161440 |
| GPU | 16776 | 78966 |
| Memory | 54670 | 116384 |
| UX | 36529 | 140445 |
| NanoReview Score | 160779 | 497235 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 12 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 for POCO | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 4:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:04 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 141 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2, 3, 5, 8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2022 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 149 | 299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1