Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Infinix Smart 10
40
out 100
VS
51
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C40 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.71 with chipsetJLQ JR510, vs Infinix Smart 10, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C40
- Larger display: 6.71in
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
Reasons to choose Infinix Smart 10
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 187g vs 204g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 84.2 % |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 34 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1170:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) | 165.62 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 9.18 mm (0.36 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Yellow |
- Black - Silver - Gold |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | JLQ JR510 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | No |
| Graphics | n/a | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 217 | 441 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 797 | 1480 |
| CPU | 52804 | 90273 |
| GPU | 16776 | 31100 |
| Memory | 54670 | 76579 |
| UX | 36529 | 71202 |
| NanoReview Score | 160779 | 269154 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 12 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 for POCO | XOS 15.1 (Go edition) |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 4:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:04 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 141 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2, 3, 5, 8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | July, 2022 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 149 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 70 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Smart 10 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
