Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
40
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C40 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.71 with chipsetJLQ JR510, vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite, Manufactured in May, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C40
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 204g vs 209g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 85 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 34 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1170:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) | 77.1 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 9.18 mm (0.36 in) | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Yellow |
- Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | JLQ JR510 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 217 | 737 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 797 | 1803 |
| CPU | 52804 | 220038 |
| GPU | 16776 | 44183 |
| Memory | 54670 | 97047 |
| UX | 36529 | 147903 |
| NanoReview Score | 160779 | 509171 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 12 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 for POCO | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 4:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:04 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 141 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PAN, OPP, LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2, 3, 5, 8 | 2G 850/900/1800 МГц |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2022 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 149 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 390 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 44 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
