Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
40
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C40 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.71 with chipsetJLQ JR510, vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G, Manufactured in March, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C40
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5200mAh
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 193g vs 204g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 85.8 % |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 34 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1170:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) | 171.17 mm (6.74 in) |
| Width | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 9.18 mm (0.36 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Yellow |
- Black - Gold - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | JLQ JR510 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | No |
| Graphics | n/a | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 217 | 441 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 797 | 1496 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 708 |
| CPU | 52804 | 91026 |
| GPU | 16776 | 30797 |
| Memory | 54670 | 75780 |
| UX | 36529 | 66310 |
| NanoReview Score | 160779 | 263913 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 12 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 for POCO | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (23% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 4:00 h | 2:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:04 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 141 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2, 3, 5, 8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | WCDMA B1/5/82G |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | July, 2022 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 149 | 129 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
