Home Phone comparison Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra - Which is better?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

62 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
VS
73 out 100
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S Manufactured in March, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultra, vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    • Larger display: 6.78in
    • Higher pixel density: 429ppi
    • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
    • Lighter design: 178g vs 179g
    • Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options 8/256 GB - 8/256 GB
    - 12/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    vs
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED AMOLED
    Size 6.67 in 6.78 in
    Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1208x2644 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
    Pixel density 395 ppi 429 ppi
    Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
    Max brightness 1300 nits n/a
    HDR support No Yes, HDR10
    Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 88.9 % 90.3 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - DC dimming    		 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    Display test
    Peak brightness (auto)
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    n/a
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    2398 nits

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 161.1 mm (6.34 in) 162.4 mm (6.39 in)
    Width 75 mm (2.95 in) 77 mm (3.03 in)
    Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 7.4 mm (0.29 in)
    Weight 179 g (6.31 oz) 178 g (6.28 oz)
    Water resistance IP64 IP69
    Back panel Plastic Glass
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - Black
    - Blue
    - Purple    		 - Black
    - Blue
    - Orange
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    88.9 %
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    90.3 %

    Performance

    Testing Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
    Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2600 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
    Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)    		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 655
    Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G615 MP2
    GPU Cores 128 256
    GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1100 MHz
    FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 665.6 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    730
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    1035
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    1811
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    2980
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7301035
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18112980
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    414914
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    799033
    CPU123393255071
    GPU64812185764
    Memory112469173375
    UX114240184823
    NanoReview Score414914799033

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
    Channels 2 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
    Memory CardMicroSDNo

    Software

    OS Android 15 Android 16
    UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 HIOS 16

    Battery

    Volume 5000 mAh 6150 mAh
    Max Charging Power 67 W 45 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging No Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (50% in 16 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:46 h 1:20 h
    Battery Life Test
    Battery Life
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S
    n/a
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    27:15
    Web Browsingn/a11:44 h
    Video Playbackn/a21:09 h
    Gamesn/a06:57 h
    Standby Moden/a100 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 200 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 16320x12240 pixels 8160x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Optical Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording No No
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    Wide-angle lens 120 ° 112 °
    Lenses count Standard: 200 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Macro: 2 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix200 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.7f/1.8
    Focal length23 mm23 mm
    SensorSamsung S5KHP3Sony LYT-700C
    Sensor size1/1.41/1.56 (0.64)
    Pixel size0.56 μm1 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalOptical
    Telephoto
    Matrixn/a50 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.4
    Focal lengthn/a70 mm
    Sensor sizen/a1/2.88 (0.35)
    Pixel sizen/a0.61 μm
    Stabilizationn/aDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix8 MP8 MP
    Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
    Focal length15 mm14 mm
    SensorSony IMX355n/a
    Sensor size1/4.01/4.0 (0.25)
    Pixel size1 μm1.12 μm
    StabilizationDigitalDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 32 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 8160x6144 pixels
    Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
    Focal length n/a 21 mm
    Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q CMOS
    Sensor size 1/3.0 1/2.76 (0.36)
    Pixel size 1 μm 0.64 μm
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotYesNo
    2G BandsGSM 850 900 1800 1900MHzn/a
    3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/8n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66)n/a
    5G SupportNoYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo n/a
    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio Yes Yes
    Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

    Other

    Class Mid-range Mid-range
    Announced March, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
    Release Date March, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
    Launch Price ($) 260 n/a
    Sensors - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 67 W Yes, 45 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below