Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 9X
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Manufactured in May, 2020, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Huawei Honor 9X, Manufactured in September, 2019 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 710F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 9X
- Lighter design: 196.8g vs 209g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 460 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4 % | 84.3 % |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 99 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 2404 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 35.2 ms | 29 ms |
| Contrast | 1649:1 | 969:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) | 163.5 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 196.8 g (6.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | HiSilicon Kirin 710F |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 719 | 512 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1874 | 1555 |
| CPU | 139577 | 89924 |
| GPU | 73153 | 34025 |
| Memory | 72832 | 59171 |
| UX | 104277 | 65482 |
| NanoReview Score | 389839 | 248602 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 42.3 °C | 43.9 °C |
| Stability | 99 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | 3 fps |
| Graphics Score | 1044 | 559 |
| Writing score | 9643 | 6877 |
| Web score | 6022 | 5821 |
| Video editing | 5453 | 4885 |
| Data manipulation | 6923 | 5361 |
| NanoReview Score | 8136 | 6430 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 18.9 GB | 15.4 GB |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | EMUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5020 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 2:25 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:27 h | 07:29 h |
| Video Playback | 13:57 h | 10:29 h |
| Games | 05:33 h | 04:36 h |
| Standby Mode | 143 h | 98 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9248x6920 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 | Sony IMX582 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC8034 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.48 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32A1Q | BSI CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20) |
| LTE category | 12 | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | n/a |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2020 yr | July, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2020 yr | September, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 185 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0