Apple A14 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2
71
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple A14 Bionic, vs Google Tensor G2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 310050 | 256594 |
| GPU | 323143 | 315697 |
| Memory | 173777 | 168964 |
| UX | 288345 | 194845 |
| NanoReview Score | 1095315 | 936100 |
| Stability | 69 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 45 fps | 36 fps |
| File Compression | 167 MB/s | 166.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 105.5 pages/s | 107.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 116.4 MP/sec | 117.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 17.6 frames/s | 14.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 51.5 frames/s | 37.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 95.7 frames/s | 87.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 147.6 MP/sec | 122.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.18 MP/sec | 4.52 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm - 4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm |
- 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3100 | 2850 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | 11.8 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple A14 GPU | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1278 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 7 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 64 |
| Total shader | 256 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 654.3 GFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
| GPU Frequency | 11 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2732x2048 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5300g |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | October, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | APL1W01 | GS201 (S5P9855) |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A14 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
