Apple A18 vs MediaTek Helio G200

95 out 100
Apple A18
VS
n/a out 100
MediaTek Helio G200

Compared 2 processors: Apple A18, vs MediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple A18 and MediaTek Helio G200
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Apple A18
1605038
MediaTek Helio G200
444826
CPU431354136988
GPU59898177982
Memory208837118244
UX365876111612
NanoReview Score1605038444826
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Apple A18
3466
MediaTek Helio G200
740
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Apple A18
8592
MediaTek Helio G200
2080
File Compression286.8 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser184.2 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering201.2 MP/secn/a
Background Blur36.2 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing90 frames/sn/a
Image Detection297.2 frames/sn/a
HDR279.1 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing8.68 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
- 4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
- 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 6 8
Frequency 4050 2200
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 8 MB n/a
Process tech. 3 nm 6 nm
Power (TDP) 9 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Apple A18 GPU Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Valhall 1st gen
GPU Frequency 1490 MHz 1100 MHz
Execution Units 5 2
Shader Units 128 32
Total shader 640 64
FLOPS 1907 GFLOPS 140.8 GFLOPS
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenCL n/a 2.0
DirectX n/a 12

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Neural Engine Yes
GPU Frequency 35 TOPS n/a

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 60 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type NVMe UFS 2.2
Max. resolution n/a 2520x1080 pixels
Camera 1x48 pixels 1x200 pixels
Video recording 4K at 120FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video quality 4K at 120FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 13
5G Support Yes No
Download speed Up to 10000 MB/s Up to 650 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 3500 MB/s Up to 150 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 7 5
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced September, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Class Flagship Mid-range
Codename APL1V08 n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A18 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below