Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
56
out 100
VS
46
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor G2, vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 256594 | 227672 |
| GPU | 315697 | 176970 |
| Memory | 168964 | 192685 |
| UX | 194845 | 179928 |
| NanoReview Score | 936100 | 777255 |
| Graphics Test | 36 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 166.4 MB/s | 169.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 107.3 pages/s | 69.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 117.5 MP/sec | 113.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 14.4 frames/s | 9.74 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 37.4 frames/s | 26.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 87.4 frames/s | 55.9 frames/s |
| HDR | 122.1 MP/sec | 98 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.52 MP/sec | 4.55 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
- 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2850 | 2600 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 512 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G710 MP7 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Valhall 4rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 848 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 7 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 128 |
| Total shader | 448 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS | 512 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | MediaTek APU 655 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300g | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 MB/s | Up to 3270 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | February, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | GS201 (S5P9855) | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor G2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
