Google Tensor G3 vs Apple A15 Bionic
68
out 100
VS
81
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor G3, vs Apple A15 Bionic. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 311872 | 309916 |
| GPU | 429184 | 432105 |
| Memory | 194724 | 243964 |
| UX | 211875 | 313105 |
| NanoReview Score | 1147655 | 1299090 |
| Stability | n/a | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 56 fps |
| File Compression | 188.3 MB/s | 203.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 136.5 pages/s | 124.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 153 MP/sec | 143.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 15 frames/s | 22.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 47 frames/s | 60.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 100.8 frames/s | 130 frames/s |
| HDR | 136.9 MP/sec | 169.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.52 MP/sec | 5.93 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3 - 4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche - 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 9 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2910 | 3230 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.5-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 12 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 15 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G715 MP7 | Apple A15 GPU |
| Architecture | Valhall 4th gen | Apple Bionic GPU |
| GPU Frequency | 890 MHz | 1338 MHz |
| Execution Units | 7 | 5 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 896 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 1594.8 GFLOPS | 1712.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Apple Neural Engine |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 15.8 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
NVMe |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2732x2048 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300i | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7300 MB/s | Up to 7500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3700 MB/s | Up to 3000 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | October, 2023 yr | September, 2021 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | GS301 (S5P9865) | APL1W07 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A15 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
