HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G85
41
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8000, vs MediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 178879 | 75141 |
| GPU | 118109 | 41989 |
| Memory | 128205 | 67477 |
| UX | 149511 | 78642 |
| NanoReview Score | 574704 | 263249 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 137.2 MB/s | 75.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 70.9 pages/s | 38.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 108.9 MP/sec | 44.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 10.3 frames/s | 3.05 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 26.3 frames/s | 12.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 55.8 frames/s | 23.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 91.7 MP/sec | 43.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.05 MP/sec | 1.75 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 45 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 40 FPS (Medium) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 21 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 49 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 51 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 46 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H - 3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L - 4x 1.84 GHz – A55 |
- 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 864 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 24 |
| Total shader | 256 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 442.3 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Balong | n/a |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 100 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | n/a | MT6769Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8000 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
