MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
49
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8000, vs Samsung Exynos 2200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 247064 | 316037 |
| GPU | 180569 | 424486 |
| Memory | 205339 | 170650 |
| UX | 230053 | 226015 |
| NanoReview Score | 863025 | 1137188 |
| Stability | n/a | 61 % |
| Graphics Test | 28 fps | 49 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 151.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 93.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 106.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 13.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 27 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 92.5 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 123.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 4.48 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 - 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 - 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2750 | 2800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G610 MP6 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Voyager (RDNA 2) |
| GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 128 |
| Total shader | 384 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 537.6 GFLOPS | 1003 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 580 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6895 | S5E9925 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
