MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
48
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8050, vs Samsung Exynos 2500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 213398 | 500921 |
| GPU | 221299 | 928912 |
| Memory | 155421 | 410202 |
| UX | 175335 | 373762 |
| NanoReview Score | 765453 | 2213797 |
| Stability | 96 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 27 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 163.8 MB/s | 386.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 96.3 pages/s | 234.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 128.8 MP/sec | 272.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.86 frames/s | 36.6 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 33.4 frames/s | 86.3 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 69.7 frames/s | 246.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 117.2 MP/sec | 313.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.59 MP/sec | 13 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925 - 2x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 3x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3000 | 3300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 3 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G77 MP9 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | RDNA 3.5 |
| GPU Frequency | 886 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Execution Units | 9 | 8 |
| Shader Units | 32 | n/a |
| Total shader | 288 | n/a |
| FLOPS | 510.3 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 570 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 77 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | - UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA | S5E9955 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8050 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 12
