MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
n/a
out 100
VS
78
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G200, vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 136988 | 369557 |
| GPU | 77982 | 553034 |
| Memory | 118244 | 278497 |
| UX | 111612 | 281877 |
| NanoReview Score | 444826 | 1482965 |
| Stability | n/a | 94 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 73 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 204.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 147 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 170.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 16.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 44.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 127.6 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 153.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 5.32 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1/3.05 (Cortex-X3) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-A715) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 3050 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 17 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 4th gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 981 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 11 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shader | 64 | 1408 |
| FLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS | 2762.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | MediaTek APU 690 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | MediaTek T800 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 650 MB/s | Up to 7900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 4200 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | November, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | MT6985 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 9200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
