MediaTek Helio G85 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
25
out 100
VS
36
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G85, vs Samsung Exynos 1330. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 75141 | 161056 |
| GPU | 41989 | 63510 |
| Memory | 67477 | 89135 |
| UX | 78642 | 125147 |
| NanoReview Score | 263249 | 438848 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | 8 fps |
| File Compression | 75.3 MB/s | 108 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 38.2 pages/s | 58.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 44.5 MP/sec | 81 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.05 frames/s | 5.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 12.2 frames/s | 21.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 23.5 frames/s | 40.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 43.3 MP/sec | 66.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.75 MP/sec | 3.06 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
45 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
40 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
21 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
49 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
46 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (1080x2340) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 949 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 32 |
| Total shader | 48 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 121.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 4.9 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | April, 2020 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Codename | MT6769Z | S5E8535 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1330 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
