MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
26
out 100
VS
92
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G92 Max, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88223 | 475806 |
| GPU | 41714 | 881311 |
| Memory | 69336 | 390065 |
| UX | 69167 | 335026 |
| NanoReview Score | 268440 | 2082208 |
| File Compression | 75.1 MB/s | 293.2 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 40 pages/s | 196.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 52.6 MP/sec | 221.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.58 frames/s | 24.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 13.5 frames/s | 63.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 25 frames/s | 154.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 45.6 MP/sec | 217.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.24 MP/sec | 8.01 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 3210 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 6 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 825 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 512 |
| Total shader | 48 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU | Hexagon |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 76.8 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x64 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 4200 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6769I | SM8735 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
