Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
37
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 147463 | 351356 |
| GPU | 87617 | 288768 |
| Memory | 92706 | 443211 |
| UX | 125543 | 211533 |
| NanoReview Score | 453329 | 1294877 |
| File Compression | 107 MB/s | 203.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 56.7 pages/s | 144.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 82.5 MP/sec | 162.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.26 frames/s | 16.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 22.3 frames/s | 51.8 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 42.4 frames/s | 91.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 66.7 MP/sec | 138.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.88 MP/sec | 6.36 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121 - 3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120 - 4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 2500 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 10 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 619 | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 256 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 460.8 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | Balong 6000 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 1500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | November, 2024 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | SM6375-AC | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 9020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
