Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A19 Pro
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1380, vs Apple A19 Pro. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 189257 | 510033 |
| GPU | 136042 | 791934 |
| Memory | 118432 | 367847 |
| UX | 154372 | 442645 |
| NanoReview Score | 598103 | 2112459 |
| Graphics Test | 16 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 142.3 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 75.9 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 105.2 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 9.3 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 25.5 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 52.9 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 91.9 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 4.02 MP/sec | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) |
- 2x 4.38 GHz - - 4x 2.51 GHz - |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 4380 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G68 MP5 | n/a |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 949 MHz | n/a |
| Execution Units | 5 | n/a |
| Shader Units | 32 | n/a |
| Total shader | 160 | n/a |
| FLOPS | 303.7 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Neural Engine |
| GPU Frequency | 4.9 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | n/a |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 3790 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | S5E8835 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1380 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0