Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A19 Pro

Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 1380, vs Apple A19 Pro. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Samsung Exynos 1380 and Apple A19 Pro
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 1380
598103
Apple A19 Pro
2112459
CPU189257510033
GPU136042791934
Memory118432367847
UX154372442645
NanoReview Score5981032112459
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Exynos 1380
2772
Apple A19 Pro
n/a
Graphics Test16 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Exynos 1380
999
Apple A19 Pro
3671
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Exynos 1380
2758
Apple A19 Pro
10834
File Compression142.3 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser75.9 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering105.2 MP/secn/a
Background Blur9.3 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing25.5 frames/sn/a
Image Detection52.9 frames/sn/a
HDR91.9 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing4.02 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2x 4.38 GHz -
- 4x 2.51 GHz -
Process Samsung TSMC
Cores count 8 6
Frequency 2400 4380
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L3 Cache 4 MB n/a
Process tech. 5 nm 3 nm
Power (TDP) 5 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G68 MP5 n/a
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen n/a
GPU Frequency 949 MHz n/a
Execution Units 5 n/a
Shader Units 32 n/a
Total shader 160 n/a
FLOPS 303.7 GFLOPS n/a
Vulkan 1.3 n/a
OpenCL 2.0 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Neural Engine
GPU Frequency 4.9 TOPS n/a

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s n/a
Max RAM 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max. resolution 2960x1440 pixels n/a
Camera 1x200 pixels 1x48 pixels
Video recording 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G Support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 1280 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 6 7
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced February, 2023 yr September, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Flagship
Codename S5E8835 n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1380 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below