Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Apple A16 Bionic
17
out 100
VS
89
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Samsung Exynos 7870, vs Apple A16 Bionic. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 52962 | 381160 |
| GPU | 8716 | 472052 |
| Memory | 40069 | 258668 |
| UX | 42984 | 329468 |
| NanoReview Score | 144731 | 1441348 |
| Stability | n/a | 79 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 59 fps |
| File Compression | 28.1 MB/s | 236.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 15.9 pages/s | 156.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 20.3 MP/sec | 162.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 0.57 frames/s | 26.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 4.16 frames/s | 77.6 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 5.6 frames/s | 155.8 frames/s |
| HDR | 15 MP/sec | 207.5 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 785.2 MP/sec | 6.85 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | 8x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 | - 2/3.46 (Everest) - 4/2.02 (Sawtooth) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 1600 | 3460 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.6-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 16 MB |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | 16 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 3 W | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-T830 MP1 | Apple A16 GPU |
| Architecture | Midgard 4th gen | Apple Bionic GPU |
| GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 1398 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 5 |
| Shader Units | 16 | 128 |
| Total shader | 16 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 22.4 GFLOPS | 1789.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Apple Neural Engine |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 17 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 1x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | NVMe |
| Max. resolution | 1920x1200 pixels | 2796x1290 pixels |
| Camera | 1x16 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Shannon 315 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 6 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 7500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 50 MB/s | Up to 3500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.1 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | February, 2016 yr | September, 2022 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | APL1W10 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A16 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
