Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
24
out 100
VS
34
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Unisoc Tiger T610, vs Samsung Exynos 1280. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 86249 | 154535 |
| GPU | 41435 | 105189 |
| Memory | 59358 | 92022 |
| UX | 63235 | 126780 |
| NanoReview Score | 250277 | 478526 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | 13 fps |
| File Compression | 72.2 MB/s | 97.2 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 36.6 pages/s | 50.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 49.3 MP/sec | 70.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.17 frames/s | 5.92 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 10.8 frames/s | 18.1 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 22.6 frames/s | 36 frames/s |
| HDR | 40.5 MP/sec | 70.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.01 MP/sec | 3.04 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1820 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 897 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 32 |
| Total shader | 48 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 58.9 GFLOPS | 229.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 4.3 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2160x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x16 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | June, 2019 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | S5E8825 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1280 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
