Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Oppo Pad 3 Pro
71
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei MatePad 12 X Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 12 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin T90A, vs Oppo Pad 3 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 12 X
- Lighter design: 555g vs 586g
- Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 9510mAh
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 304ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2800x1840 pixels | 2120x3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 540 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8 % | 85.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.6 % | n/a |
| Response time | 21 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1122:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 270 mm (10.63 in) | 268.66 mm (10.58 in) |
| Width | 183 mm (7.2 in) | 195.06 mm (7.68 in) |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm (0.23 in) | 6.49 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 555 g (19.58 oz) | 586 g (20.67 oz) |
| Area | 494 cm² (76.57 in²) | 524 cm² (81.22 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Green |
- Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin T90A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2490 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | n/a | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | n/a | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Hexagon |
| Graphics | n/a | Adreno 750 |
| GPU Cores | n/a | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 2774 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1229 | 2179 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3987 | 6500 |
| CPU | 293566 | 435162 |
| GPU | 171805 | 852747 |
| Memory | 226709 | 454700 |
| UX | 160938 | 360056 |
| NanoReview Score | 853018 | 2102665 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 30 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | n/a | ColorOS 14.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 10100 mAh | 9510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (65% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 0:56 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 4608x3456 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 549 | 500 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
