Home Tablet comparison OnePlus Pad Go and Honor MagicPad 3 - Which is better?

OnePlus Pad Go vs Honor MagicPad 3

62 out 100
OnePlus Pad Go
VS
86 out 100
Honor MagicPad 3
OnePlus Pad Go
Honor MagicPad 3

Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Pad Go Manufactured in October, 2023, with display 11.35 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Honor MagicPad 3, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad Go
  • Lighter design: 532g vs 595g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Honor MagicPad 3
  • Larger display: 13.3in
  • Higher pixel density: 289ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 12450mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs OnePlus Pad Go and Honor MagicPad 3
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
OnePlus Pad Go
vs
Honor MagicPad 3

Display

Display quality comparison
Type LTPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.35 in 13.3 in
Resolution 1720x2408 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Pixel density 260 ppi 289 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 400 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes, HDR10
Screen-to-body ratio 83.2 % 89 %
Features n/a DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 255.12 mm (10.04 in) 293.9 mm (11.57 in)
Width 188.04 mm (7.4 in) 201.4 mm (7.93 in)
Thickness 6.89 mm (0.27 in) 5.8 mm (0.23 in)
Weight 532 g (18.77 oz) 595 g (20.99 oz)
Area 480 cm² (74.4 in²) 592 cm² (91.76 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors Green - White
- Gold
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
OnePlus Pad Go
83.2 %
Honor MagicPad 3
89 %

Performance

Testing OnePlus Pad Go and Honor MagicPad 3 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520)
- 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 750
GPU Cores 128 1536
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 2774 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
OnePlus Pad Go
719
Honor MagicPad 3
2176
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
OnePlus Pad Go
1926
Honor MagicPad 3
6707
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7192176
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)19266707
Geekbench Compute (GPU)1410n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [OnePlus Pad Go], [Honor MagicPad 3]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
OnePlus Pad Go
396058
Honor MagicPad 3
n/a
CPU122057391366
GPU69913765579
Memory110906372850
UX93182290742
NanoReview Score396058n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 13 Android 15
UI Skin OxygenOS 13.2 MagicOS 9

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 12450 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 66 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 50 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 2:00 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No n/a
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 9 MP
Aperture n/a f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes, DP 1.2
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 8.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced October, 2023 yr July, 2025 yr
Release Date October, 2023 yr July, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 240 n/a
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes, 66 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Honor MagicPad 3 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
1 (33.33%)
2 (66.67%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below