Oppo Pad 3 Pro vs Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen), Manufactured in May, 2022with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 3 Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 304ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 9510mAh vs 7700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- Lighter design: 465g vs 586g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 10.61 in |
| Resolution | 2120x3000 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 304 ppi | 220 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 540 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2 % | 80.4 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 268.66 mm (10.58 in) | 251.2 mm (9.89 in) |
| Width | 195.06 mm (7.68 in) | 158.8 mm (6.25 in) |
| Thickness | 6.49 mm (0.26 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 586 g (20.67 oz) | 465 g (16.4 oz) |
| Area | 524 cm² (81.22 in²) | 399 cm² (61.85 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gold - Blue |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2179 | 415 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6500 | 1457 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 578 |
| CPU | 435162 | 106887 |
| GPU | 852747 | 40266 |
| Memory | 454700 | 88622 |
| UX | 360056 | 76012 |
| NanoReview Score | 2102665 | 311787 |
| Stability | n/a | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 679 |
| Writing score | n/a | 7919 |
| Web score | n/a | 4928 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4967 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6228 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6951 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 14.1 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 9510 mAh | 7700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 20 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:56 h | 3:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM B2/B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B2/B5(B6/B19)/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 500 | 159 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0