Oppo Pad 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Pad 3 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Pad 3 Pro
  • Higher pixel density: 304ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 586g vs 610g
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
  • Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 9510mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB
n/a

Review

Key Specs Oppo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 in 12.1 in
Resolution 2120x3000 pixels 1600x2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 7:5 16:10
Pixel density 304 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 900 nits n/a
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 540 Hz 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 85.2 % 83.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 268.66 mm (10.58 in) 279.8 mm (11.02 in)
Width 195.06 mm (7.68 in) 181.65 mm (7.15 in)
Thickness 6.49 mm (0.26 in) 7.5 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 586 g (20.67 oz) 610 g (21.52 oz)
Area 524 cm² (81.22 in²) 508 cm² (78.74 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gold
- Blue
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Pad 3 Pro
85.2 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
83.5 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Pad 3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Max Frequency 3400 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520)
- 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720))
- 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon Yes
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 810
GPU Cores 1536 256
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 895 MHz
FLOPS 2774 GFLOPS 458.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Pad 3 Pro
2179
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
1229
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Pad 3 Pro
6500
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
3197
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)21791229
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)65003197
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Pad 3 Pro
2102665
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
n/a
CPU435162306232
GPU852747327665
Memory454700213580
UX360056229615
NanoReview Score2102665n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 14.1 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 9510 mAh 12000 mAh
Max Charging Power 67 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (65% in 30 min) Yes (20% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:56 h 3:00 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a No
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length23 mmn/a
Sensor sizen/a1/4 (0.25)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.2
Focal length n/a 17 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" 1/5.0 (0.2)
Pixel size 1.12 μm 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *n/aNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced October, 2024 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr November, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 500 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included Yes 67 W Yes, 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Pad 3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below