Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Vivo Pad 6 Pro
72
out 100
VS
91
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 13.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1580, vs Vivo Pad 6 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 6 Pro
- Larger display: 13.2in
- Higher pixel density: 348ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 663g vs 664g
- Higher battery capacity: 13000mAh vs 10090mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.1 in | 13.2 in |
| Resolution | 1800x2880 pixels | 2512x3840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 348 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | n/a |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 87.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 in) | 297 mm (11.69 in) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 in) | 199.8 mm (7.87 in) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 in) | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 663 g (23.39 oz) |
| Area | 585 cm² (90.68 in²) | 593 cm² (91.92 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
n/a |
| Process | Samsung | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | Yes | n/a |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 540 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 256 | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1376 | 3747 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3860 | 11695 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 6952 | n/a |
| CPU | 299365 | 1110159 |
| GPU | 259844 | 1516479 |
| Memory | 149182 | 602280 |
| UX | 192377 | 923467 |
| NanoReview Score | 900768 | 4152385 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 10090 mAh | 13000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 4000x3000 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
n/a |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
