Home Tablet comparison Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite and Vivo Pad 6 Pro - Which is better?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite vs Vivo Pad 6 Pro

61 out 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
VS
91 out 100
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Vivo Pad 6 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 10.9 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1380, vs Vivo Pad 6 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
  • Lighter design: 524g vs 663g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo Pad 6 Pro
  • Larger display: 13.2in
  • Higher pixel density: 348ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 13000mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite and Vivo Pad 6 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
vs
Vivo Pad 6 Pro

Display

Display quality comparison
Type TFT LCD IPS LCD
Size 10.9 in 13.2 in
Resolution 1320x2112 pixels 2512x3840 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
Pixel density 228 ppi 348 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
HDR support No Yes, HDR10
Screen-to-body ratio 81.7 % 87.5 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 254.3 mm (10.01 in) 297 mm (11.69 in)
Width 165.8 mm (6.53 in) 199.8 mm (7.87 in)
Thickness 6.5 mm (0.26 in) 6.2 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 524 g (18.48 oz) 663 g (23.39 oz)
Area 422 cm² (65.41 in²) 593 cm² (91.92 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Red		 - Gray
- Blue
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
81.7 %
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
87.5 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite and Vivo Pad 6 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Samsung Exynos 1380 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency 2400 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) n/a
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)		 n/a
Process Samsung n/a
Transistor Size 5 nm n/a
Neural Processor Yes n/a
Graphics Mali-G68 MP5 n/a
GPU Cores 160 n/a
GPU Frequency 949 MHz n/a
FLOPS 303.7 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
1011
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
3747
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
2951
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
11695
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)10113747
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)295111695
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite], [Vivo Pad 6 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
n/a
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
4152385
CPU1973331110159
GPU1688311516479
Memory113518602280
UX144132923467
NanoReview Scoren/a4152385

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
UI Skin One UI 7.0 OriginOS 6

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 13000 mAh
Max Charging Power 25 W 66 W
Battery Type Li-ion Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes
Full Charge Time 2:00 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0n/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 5 MP 8 MP
Matrix n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Sensor CMOS n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers n/a 8.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced August, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
Release Date August, 2025 yr April, 2026 yr
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
Charger Included No Yes, 66 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Pad 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below