Home Tablet comparison Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 - Which is better?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

94 out 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
VS
80 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 14.6 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
  • Larger display: 14.6in
  • Higher battery capacity: 11600mAh vs 8850mAh
  • Built-in eSIM
  • Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 692g
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Display

Display quality comparison
Type Dynamic AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 14.6 in 11.2 in
Resolution 1848x2960 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
Pixel density 239 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) n/a
Max brightness 1000 nits 800 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8 % 85.7 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 326.3 mm (12.85 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 208.5 mm (8.21 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 5.1 mm (0.2 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 692 g (24.41 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 680 cm² (105.4 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance IP68 No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Gray		 - Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display No
Screen-to-body ratio
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
90.8 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 3630 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925)		 - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 1536 768
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
2800
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
1873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
9173
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
5149
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)28001873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)91735149
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra], [Xiaomi Poco Pad X1]
AnTuTu 10
CPU625616365078
GPU1312222467273
Memory509411309615
UX459201239702

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage Typen/aUFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 15
OS Size 28.1 GB n/a
UI Skin One UI 8.0 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 11600 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 45 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (76% in 61 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:50 h 1:20 h

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 4128x3096 pixels 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP		 Standard: 13 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix13 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length26 mmn/a
Sensorn/aOmnivision OV13B10
Sensor size1/3.41/3.06 (0.33)
Pixel size1 μm1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.2n/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 12 MP 8 MP
Matrix 4000x3000 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.3
Sensor CMOS Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 n/a
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
SIM ModeDual SIM Standbyn/a
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced September, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date September, 2025 yr November, 2025 yr
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included No Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below