Xiaomi Redmi Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
53
out 100
VS
80
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 10.61 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4, Manufactured in February, 2024with chipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Lighter design: 445g vs 590g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Larger display: 12.4in
- Higher pixel density: 295ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 10.61 in | 12.4 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 2032x3048 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 220 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-144 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81 % | 85.8 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 96.6 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1493:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 250.38 mm (9.86 in) | 278.7 mm (10.97 in) |
| Width | 157.98 mm (6.22 in) | 191.58 mm (7.54 in) |
| Thickness | 7.05 mm (0.28 in) | 6.26 mm (0.25 in) |
| Weight | 445 g (15.7 oz) | 590 g (20.81 oz) |
| Area | 396 cm² (61.38 in²) | 534 cm² (82.77 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 740 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 735 | 1942 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1994 | 5624 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1301 | 8800 |
| CPU | 91220 | 360581 |
| GPU | 59261 | 545348 |
| Memory | 75598 | 334036 |
| UX | 77730 | 289730 |
| NanoReview Score | 303809 | 1529695 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 22.9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (88% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:21 h | 0:38 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 06:54 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 09:32 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:50 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 171 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | SK Hynix Hi-846 | OmniVision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | 1/3.6" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes DP 1.2 |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 239 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes 120 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
