Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Compared 2 processors: Intel Processor N97, vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Processor N97 and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Intel Processor N97
973
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Intel Processor N97
3003
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Processor N97
63
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
124
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Processor N97
192
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
1125
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Processor N97
1952
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Processor N97
5673
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Integer Math16.4 GOps/s83.2 GOps/s
Floating-Point Math11.1 GOps/s105.6 GOps/s
Prime Number Search23 M primes/s350 M primes/s
Random String Sort7.7 M strings/s41.8 M strings/s
Data Encryption4.3 GB/s26.7 GB/s
Data Compression61.8 MB/s346.8 MB/s
Physics420 frames/s3055 frames/s
Extended Instructions31 M matrices/s289 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Intel Processor N97
1230
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Intel Processor N97
2800
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
File Compression319.2 MB/s1350 MB/s
Clang Compilation20.1 KLines/s75.9 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser66 pages/s432.9 pages/s
PDF Rendering88.9 MP/sec446.5 MP/sec
Text Processing139.9 pages/s289.4 pages/s
Background Blur10.5 frames/s66 frames/s
Photo Processing23 frames/s152 frames/s
Ray Tracing2.53 MP/sec26.2 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Processor N97
34.46
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
281.68

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 233.3 PPW 675.9 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 472.8 PPW 1358.6 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 16 PPW 45 PPW
Blender / W 2.87 PPW 11.27 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Announced January, 3, 2023 January, 5, 2026
Type Laptop use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Alder Lake Panther Lake
Model number N97 358H
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics (24EU) Arc B390

Processor

Performance cores
Cores n/a 4
Threads n/a 4
Frequency n/a 1.9 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) n/a 4.8 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores412
Threads412
Frequency3.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)n/a3.7 GHz
General
Cores count416
Threads count416
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier36x19x
L1 cache96 KB/core192 KB/core
L2 cache2000 KB/core2560 KB/core
L3 Cache6 MB total18 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Process tech. 10 nm 2 nm
Power (TDP) 12 W 15-25 W
Max TDP (Boost) n/a 80 W
Socket BGA-1264 FCBGA2540
Critical temp. 105 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-4800
LPDDR5X-9600
Max Size 16 GB 96 GB
Channels 1 2
ECC support No No
Max memory bandwidth n/a 153.6 GB

Other

PCIe Version 3.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 9 12

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra X7 358H the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below