Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
0
0
0
0
188
127
118
90
The Witcher 3
157
107
78
61
207
175
126
67
Counter-Strike 2
0
0
0
0
280
212
152
82
Far Cry 6
0
0
0
0
155
145
126
75
Hogwarts Legacy
0
0
0
0
131
107
84
45
COD Modern Warfare 3
0
0
0
0
172
161
124
80
Ghost of Tsushima
0
0
0
0
116
101
82
51
Cyberpunk 2077
0
0
0
0
145
131
89
43
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
0
0
0
0
242
218
170
91
Avg FPS
1080p High-182
1080p Ultra-153
1440p Ultra-119
4K Ultra-69
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
13577
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
21949
Time Spyn/a19900
Solar Bay3156197504
Port Royaln/a13633
Fire Striken/a47520
Night Raidn/a139527
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
116754
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
211669
Background Blur195 frames/s320.8 frames/s
Face Detection125.9 frames/s207.2 frames/s
Horizon Detection4.82 Gpix/sec10.1 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection7.47 Gpix/sec14.4 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur5.8 Gpix/sec11.5 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching1.06 Gpix/sec1.48 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching417.4 Gpix/sec984.2 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics17079.9 fps27764.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
26673
G2D Markn/a1060
DirectX 11n/a220 fps
DirectX 12n/a110 fps
GPU Computen/a15547 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
247.3 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
247.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)1316.3 fps978.4 fps
Car Chase950.9 fps854.1 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)911 fps747.4 fps
T-Rex3917.4 fps3732.1 fps
ALU 21756 fps6650.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2654.4 fps296 fps
APIMetalOpenGL
OSOS XWindows
Tessellationn/a6622.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced October, 30, 2024 September, 24, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Professional Gaming
Segment Mid-range High-end
Architecture Apple M GPU Ampere
Codename Custom GA102
Price n/a 1499

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 1395 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 1695 MHz
Shader Units 5120 10496
TMUs 320 328
ROPs 160 112
Execution Units 640 82
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 82
Tensor Cores n/a 328
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 6000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 288 Gpix/sec 190 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 576 GTex/s 556 GTex/s
FLOPS 18.4 TFLOPS 35.6 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 62 W 350 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 3 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 628 mm²
Transistor count n/a 28 billion
Transistor density n/a 44.59 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6X
Memory Frequency 8533 MHz 1219 MHz
Bus 512 bit 384 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 19500 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 24 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
546 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
936.2 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.6
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below