Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
38
out 100
VS
59
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 168 118 106 78 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 195 162 116 61 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 275 206 150 83 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 150 136 114 71 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 119 96 76 41 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 153 147 108 72 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 109 90 72 43 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 133 121 80 36 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 207 196 151 81 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 168 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 141 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 108 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 63 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 17662 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 85932 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 11595 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 42429 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 132288 |
| Background Blur | 106 frames/s | 217.3 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 73.1 frames/s | 141.9 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.59 Gpix/sec | 8.19 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.8 Gpix/sec | 11 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.4 Gpix/sec | 8.43 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.73 Gpix/sec | 1.29 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 198.6 Gpix/sec | 780.7 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8166.3 fps | 22538.5 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 1052 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 207 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 100 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 14559 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 950.5 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 809.5 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 705.4 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 3525.4 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 6005.6 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 283.8 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 6034.6 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Apple | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | October, 29, 2024 | September, 1, 2020 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Professional | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | High-end |
| Architecture | Apple M GPU | Ampere |
| Codename | Custom | GA102 |
| Price | n/a | 699 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2048 | 8704 |
| TMUs | 128 | 272 |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| Execution Units | 256 | 68 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | n/a | 68 |
| Tensor Cores | n/a | 272 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 5000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 115 Gpix/sec | 164 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 230 GTex/s | 465 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 7.4 TFLOPS | 29.8 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Custom | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 26 W | 320 W |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 628 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 44.59 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 7500 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 320 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 15000 MB/s | 19000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 10 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | n/a | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 8.6 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 2 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
