Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core) and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
201
136
129
100
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
220
189
136
70
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
284
219
160
83
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
159
149
130
83
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
139
113
92
52
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
182
177
135
92
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
124
104
90
55
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
162
144
96
47
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
257
240
188
102
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a192
1080p Ultran/a163
1440p Ultran/a128
4K Ultran/a76
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
25937
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
23652
Time Spyn/a22766
Solar Bayn/a108197
Port Royaln/a13985
Fire Striken/a53566
Night Raidn/a170143
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
218394
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
219163
Background Blurn/a371.2 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a235 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a7.51 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a10.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a12.4 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a2.03 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a1120 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a30420.2 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
31654
G2D Markn/a1197
DirectX 11n/a289 fps
DirectX 12n/a115 fps
GPU Computen/a18571 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
249.8 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a1246.5 fps
Car Chasen/a1077.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a884.8 fps
T-Rexn/a4829.9 fps
ALU 2n/a8110.1 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a285.3 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a7994.7

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced May, 1, 2025 January, 3, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Professional Gaming
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU Ada Lovelace
Codename Custom AD104
Price n/a 799

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 2310 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 2610 MHz
Shader Units 10240 7680
TMUs 640 240
ROPs 320 80
Execution Units 1280 60
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 60
Tensor Cores n/a 240
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 48000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 576 Gpix/sec 209 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 1152 GTex/s 626 GTex/s
FLOPS 36.9 TFLOPS 40.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 120 W 285 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 5 nm
Transistor Size n/a 294 mm²
Transistor count n/a 35 billion
Transistor density n/a 119.05 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6X
Memory Frequency 8533 MHz 1313 MHz
Bus 1024 bit 192 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 21000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 12 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
504.2 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.9
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
20 (32.26%)
42 (67.74%)
Total Votes: 62

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below